Born on September 25, 1929, in Chicago, Julian Braun displayed an early aptitude for mathematics and science. He earned dual Bachelor of Science degrees in Mathematics and Physics from the Illinois Institute of Technology. After serving in the Marines, he pursued postgraduate studies at San Diego State College (now San Diego State University) before working at Chrysler’s Missile Systems Division in Detroit.
Braun joined IBM in 1961, where his access to powerful computers allowed him to refine blackjack strategies. His contributions include:
Braun’s simulations ran 9 billion hands on IBM mainframes, a staggering feat in the 1960s. His work proved that blackjack could be beaten with the right strategy, shifting the game from luck-based to skill-based.
Braun was a reserved man, preferring solitude over fame. He never married and had no children. After retiring from IBM in 1987, he traded commodities from his Chicago apartment. A chess enthusiast and stamp collector, he lived quietly until his death on September 4, 2000, from complications of Parkinson’s disease.
Unlike modern advantage players, Braun didn’t amass wealth from gambling. His income came from IBM and book royalties, though he reportedly saw little profit from his own work due to publishing disputes.
The Foundation of Card
Counting
Braun’s calculations remains the backbone of the blackjack strategy. His influence is seen in Thorp’s Hi-Lo Count
Revere’s Point Count
Humble’s Hi-Opt I & II, Modern software-based blackjack analysis
No. Braun was primarily a mathematician and programmer who used simulations to perfect blackjack strategy. He occasionally played but never relied on gambling for income.
How to Play Winning Blackjack had a limited print run. His publisher retained rights, preventing reprints. Copies now sell for hundreds of dollars.
His computer simulations proved that card counting worked, refining Thorp’s original strategies and enabling modern counting systems.
Not significantly. He earned a salary from IBM but saw little profit from his book due to publishing disputes.
He helped develop multiple systems, including Hi-Opt I & II, but personally preferred the Hi-Lo count for its simplicity.